Thursday

11-09-2025 Vol 19

The influences of the halo effect on Kagame and how most people are blind to it.

“He not only refused to intervene, he actively sought to allow it to happen”.

Mastering the Rwandan genocide. Who and Why? 

As Press welcomes all ideas that might help to to give the right answer to this question including classified material.
Join and support this effort wherever you are.

  • Deny the Rwandan Dictator global space.
  • Do it for falsely imprisoned opposition leaders, Victoire Ingabire, Deo Mushayidi and Bernard Ntaganda.
  • Do it the murdered opposition leader Andrew Kagwa Rwisereka and journalist Leonard Rugambage.
  • Do it for all the Rwandans the serial killer Kagame has murdered in the last 17 years.

ICTR has always been a bait-and-switch, and that there’s been no justice administered to the real masterminds of the Rwandan genocide”.


The architects of the Rwanda genocide, Paul Kagame and his main advisors are free and remain at large. Beware: They move among you.

Definition : The halo effect or halo error is a cognitive bias in which one’s judgments of a person’s character can be influenced by one’s overall impression of him or her. It can be found in a range of situations from the courtroom to the classroom and in everyday interactions. The halo effect was given its name by psychologist Edward Thorndike; subsequent researchers have studied it in relation to attractiveness and its bearing on the judicial and educational systems.

Kagame’s definition:

Myth 1: A Deficit of Logic in the Great Lakes of Africa(2011) by Francis Xavier Ndagabanye Muhoozi


Myth 2 : The Rwanda Crisis (1995)

Myth  3: A Biographical Encyclopedia of Contemporary Genocide (2012)

Myth  4: The Oxford Encyclopedia of African Thought (2010)

Paul Kagame became president in 2000 and led Rwanda into an unsuccessful and bloody conflict with the Democratic Republic of Congo, which….bla,bla,bla and bla, bla.


This made the Rwanda place first place in a ranking of countries that are the biggest sources of financial outflow attributed to corruption, bloody diamonds, slavery, bribery, theft, massacres, forced disappearances,  tax evasion, smuggling and other illegal activities between Kagame cohorts and the essential elements of the system are secrecy, jurisdictions, disguised corporations, anonymous trust accounts, and fake charitable foundations among which Blair and Clinton’s NGOs. One of the world’s biggest financial black holes is in Rwanda.

Rwanda’s genocide and the bloody legacy of Anglo-American guilt

Paul Kagame : African success story or authoritarian state?
The guest speaker was Paul Kagame – the President of Rwanda – who is credited with lifting Rwanda out of
poverty. He is also a despot who rigs elections, tortures dissenters, and kills political opponents.

Dangerous Liaisons

At the lecture, Gearty heaped effusive praise on Kagame. It went above and beyond what courtesy required; it bordered on the sycophantic. It was also misleading. Gearty described Kagame as winning “a landslide victory in democratically contested elections,” and lauded his “experience in dealing with rights abuses.”
Most alarming of all was the reaction of the audience. Probably knowing little about Rwanda, they looked to Gearty’s behavior for guidance. And they followed his cue. They laughed at Kagame’s terrible jokes, and when, at one point, a Congolese rights campaigner got up and criticized Kagame for his abuses, the audience laughed and jeered at the campaigner like he was a clown.
Kagame, of course, loved it. He smiled smugly. With no hint of irony he criticized African “one-party states” and addressed his lone critic like he was indulging a local loon. Not once did Gearty even question Kagame (an act within his rights as the moderator), and when Kagame denounced human rights organizations, Gearty didn’t even blink. And I squirmed in my seat thinking that either I or everyone else in the hall had gone mad.

President Kagame has similarly mesmerised Tony Blair (who called him a “visionary leader”), Bill Clinton (“one of the greatest leaders of our time”), Clare Short (“such a sweetie”) and Howard Schultz, chief executive of Starbucks, who was persuaded to invest here. Such idolatry raises the question, what spell does this flinty statesman with bookish, even nerdy looks, with no obvious charisma, cast over western leaders – and why is it now wearing thin?

  1. Kagame didn’t turn out to be a reformer, as western media freely acknowledges.
  2. Kagame fashions himself as a man of the people, a man who stopped the genocide (he masterminded), as a reformer.
  3. Kagame, Saddam Hussein and Muammar Qaddafi. What is that difference?

  4. Rwanda Genocide: Honoring the Dead Without Honoring the Lies

“The Kigali regime has used all kinds of strategies to control the proceedings of the ICTR and to make it the tribunal of the victor. Such strategies should not be allowed by the U.S. justice system. Despite those strategies, most Cabinet ministers detained by the ICTR were found not guilty”.


Michael Hourigan was afraid to single out publicly the name of Clinton


Michael Hourigan, dans le secret profond de ses enquêtes spéciales, a découvert que c’étaient Kagame et Bill Clinton qui avaient abattu l’avion de Habyarimana, déclenchant la tragédie du Rwanda. 

The Obama administration should heed the call. Kagame’s legitimacy comes less from highly-manipulated elections than from the recognition he gets at home and abroad as the man who stopped the genocide.

The crowds head towards the hilltop – thousands of Rwandans streaming in from the surrounding fields and villages. They are ushered, efficiently, into smaller groups; searched, given flags, and then guided towards orderly clusters of roped-off areas. It is all done neatly, and without fuss.
kaga_afp.jpg
“….Then come the speeches. First a local man, then a woman, stand on the podium and tell the crowd how they have become rich – quickly. The woman started with one goat. Now she has two hundred cows and seven staff. The crowd roars.
I have been to my fair share of election rallies in Africa. They do not normally start like this. They are certainly never on time. The subtext is always power, not prosperity. In Kenya, the guest speakers are usually defectors from rival parties who grovel and confess.
The cheering from the back of the crowd signals the arrival of President Paul Kagame.
Tall, thin, slow to smile – he walks down the aisle like a university professor dutifully acknowledging his students’ approval, but concerned that some of their essays are not up to scratch.
On the podium, Mr Kagame claps awkwardly and briefly to the music, then he launches into a peevish lecture about unnamed forces that are trying to destabilize Rwanda. His style may be donnish, but his language is that of a soldier. Those who give our country a bad image… can take a rope and hang themselves,” he says, peering at the television cameras”.

Whoever shot down the plane, the killing began within hours, as Kagame and his Tutsi army fought their way toward Kigali to stop the genocide they had helped provoke. Traveling with them, by his own account, was at least one American – the refugee’s friend Roger Winter.
Should Congress ever investigate America’s role in the Rwandan holocaust, Mr. Winter would be a star witness.
Lying About Rwanda’s Genocide Why President Clinton refused to intervene in Rwanda? The advice 

The omission that made him and Kagame famous !

From the early 1980s, Winter ran the U.S. Committee on Refugees, a private Non-Governmental Organization. Washington provided some 75% of his NGO’s budget, but Winter – unlike overt government officials – was free to help the Tutsis organize a conference in Washington in August 1988. The meeting greatly increased support from exiles outside Uganda to the political wing of the Tutsi army, the Rwandan Patriotic Front.

The RPF, as it was known, played down its Tutsi roots, called itself multi-ethnic, and placed prominent Hutu dissidents in leadership posts. But Kagame and his Tutsi associates kept it – and their army – under firm control, and continued to press for a change in the Hutu government of President Juvenal Habyarimana that would permit the refugees to return to Rwanda.
Washington increased its support for Musaveni’s Uganda, which permitted his military to give increasing supplies of munitions, automatic rifles, mortars, artillery, and Soviet-designed Katyusha multiple rocket systems to Kagame’s Tutsi troops. With this support, the Tutsis stepped up their incursions into Rwanda from their Ugandan bases.
At the same time, both Paris and Washington pressed President Habyarimana to accept a UN-brokered power-sharing agreement that would allow the Tutsi refugees to return to Rwanda. Perhaps the deep thinkers in Washington saw the Tutsi military attacks as pressure toward a peaceful settlement. If they did, they soon found out how wrong they were.
     The climax came on April 6, 1994, when Habyarimana was flying home from peace talks in Tanzania. As his French Falcon 50 aircraft approached Kigali airport, a ground-to-air missile blew the plane apart.
     American officials quickly blamed Hutu extremists, who saw Habyarimana as too willing to compromise with the Tutsis. Now, the well-respected French anti-terrorist judge Jean-Louis Bruguiere is reportedly accusing Kagame of personally ordering the assassination – a charge that the Rwandan ruler bitterly denies. Other reports suggest that a Tutsi commando team in Kigali fired Soviet missiles that the Americans captured during the first Gulf War and gave to the Ugandans.
    Again and again :
Whoever shot down the plane, the killing began within hours, as Kagame and his Tutsi army fought their way toward Kigali to stop the genocide they had helped provoke. Traveling with them, by his own account, was at least one American – the refugee’s friend Roger Winter.
     Should Congress ever investigate America’s role in the Rwandan holocaust, Mr. Winter would be a star witness.

The Truth can be buried and stomped into the ground where none can see, yet eventually it will, like a seed, break through the surface once again far more potent than ever, and Nothing can stop it. Truth can be suppressed for a “time”, yet It cannot be destroyed. ==> Wolverine

The Truth can be buried and stomped into the ground where none can see, yet eventually it will, like a seed, break through the surface once again far more potent than ever, and Nothing can stop it. Truth can be suppressed for a time, yet It cannot be destroyed => Wolverine

Malcom

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *