
Rwanda : ne les oublions pas … These are Hutu refugees killed in Mugunga refugee camp.
door ytchristophe Readers who are informed will be noticed that the conclusion is the well-known kagame’s scenario. A story based on lies can not lead to justice nor reconciliation between parties in the conflict.
The Mugunga, Lac Vert, Masisi, Kibumba, Katale, areas in which heavy sheltering had broken out in 1996 remained a war zone in 1996. RPF ARMY and its armed groups controlled the region, attacking villages, burning down homes and looting health centres and parishes. Massacres were perpetrated throughout the area by all sides. Many independent organizations found evidence of a massacre in which at least hundred of thousands of Hutus were brutally and cynically slaughtered.
Following these events, the elitist Tutsi minority that had provided for the Rwandan kings during centuries and had treated the Hutu minority as “untermenschen”, and their military leader Paul Kagamé regained power. The price that had to be paid was that he abandoned his ethnic brothers, the Tutsi, who had remained in Rwanda, to their fate by turning them in to the Rwandan Hutu agitators, who were heated up by the attempted assassination. Later, after he had recaptured Kigali, he presented himself as the great saviour from genocide.
Since their recent recapturing of power in Kigali, Kagamé and his followers call everybody, who dares to criticise them, a “génocidaire”, genocidalist. The theory behind this statement is as simple as effective: Since according to the Tutsi version it was Kagame and his RPF troops, who stopped the genocide with their victorious invasion of Kigali in June 1994, everyone who stands in their way or merely questions or criticizes them, is allegedly someone who protects the genocidal Hutu. Consequently he is also a “génocidaire”, a genocidalist. The fact that the FPR, who after regaining power in Kigali, immediately turned the tables and pursued thousands of Hutus and expelled 100,000 was presented as a legitimate self-defense.
Consequently, hundreds of thousands of Hutus left the country in panic and sought shelter in the regions along the border, in particular in the giant camps in South Kivu in close proximity to Bukavu. Probably there had been militant Hutus among them as well, or members of the notorious Interahamwe militias, who were – at least according to the official version – guilty of several armed assaults on the Tutsi in Rwanda or in the Congo. In the refugee camps, everybody was packed together: militant Hutus, obstinate, but predominantly simple people, who wanted to escape the murdering in Rwanda.
There were altogether about 1,650,000 refugees. Not all of them could be “génocidaires”, as little as every German under Hitler was a Nazi. Due to the failure of the international community, after the bombardment of the camps by Kabila’s troops, a large number of these people died from exhaustion, hunger or in massacres.
Is such a fate now being repeated in Eastern Congo?
Tried and trusted Tutsi followers
It is less known that even at that time the Tutsi government in Rwanda was considering a “Final Solution” for the ethnic problems, i.e. for the Hutu majority. The inland Hutu were and still are ostracised as the “initiators of the events in 1994” and treated alike. They would never leave Rwanda to the Tutsi minority, Kagamé probably thought. Moreover, he could never rely on democratic elections, numerically, as the Hutu make up to 80% of the Rwandese population.
Thus in 1996, a deal between Kigali and Laurent Désiré Kabila was probably agreed upon: Paul Kagame was to eliminate the Hutu refugee camps on his march through the jungle first, then he was to continue his march on Kinshasa using the puppet Laurent Kabila, with military support from RPA, Uganda and Burundi, United States and Great Britain. Afterwards Kabila was to install his masters Tutsis in the corridors of power in Kinshasa, like for example James Kabarebé, Kagamé’s faithful comrade in arms for many years of civil war and exile Tutsi, like Paul Kagamé. Kabarebe was made general chief of staff of the Congolese national army by Kabila. Thus Rwanda made sure there would be a “final solution” of its Hutu problem and Rwanda would gain direct influence on Kinshasa’s decisions.
The first part of the deal, the taboo genocide of the Rwandese Hutu refugees of 1996, was accomplished by father Kabila. He did, however, not accomplish the second part – at least not completely. The effect was that in 1998 the so-called rebellion war of the disloyal Tutsi generals took place, who were disappointed by Kabila; this was the East Congo War from 1998 to 2003. Since Kabila acted differently than expected with the mining companies Western Mineral rights, he was cowardly murdered on 16 January 2001 and his son Joseph Kabila was made president of the interim government.
What is less known is the fact that Joseph Kabila, the current Congolese president, actively served as a high officer in the campaign of his father and is therefore jointly responsible for the bombardment of the Hutu refugee camps in South Kivu in 1996, which put hundreds of thousands of refugees to renewed flight and finally to death. The same applies to James Kabarebé, the current commander in chief of the Rwandese army, whom Kabila had made Congolese commander in chief.
Another former faithful comrade in arms of the exile Rwandese Tutsi army linked to Kagamé is the new “strong” man in North Kivu, around whom the current situation in North Kivu is revolving, and who is mainly responsible for the current sufferings of the Eastern Congo refugees: Laurent Nkunda. The highest responsible officer for the security of the Congolese population in this region, General Amisi, a general in the Congolese national army, is another old comrade in arms of Kagamé and Kabarebé, just as General Nkunda.
The “rebel”-general (Nkunda) and the boss of the Congolese law enforcement forces, whose task would actually be to defang and disarm him, belong both of them to the same old party of followers, who came to power by the Rwandese 1994 atrocities, atrocities, which they had helped to initiate, if not even coldly planned. This is the true background of today’s atrocities in North Kivu, a background, which is hardly ever illuminated by the western America-friendly and Kagamé-friendly media.
Does the “genocide argument” cover a new genocide or is it the continuation of the hidden genocide against Hutus made up easier by the very wanted planed massacres of interior Tutsis by general Kagame and his supporters as a bridge to seize power in Rwanda?
UN Institutions, Western media fueling, spreading and speeding up the Rwandan genocide against the majority Hutu ethnic members.
The plan was to fuel up hatred among the international community to encourage them to close eyes during the then ongoing genocide.
- http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-64645853.html
- http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1P1-98690046.html
- http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1P2-652919.html
- http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-64634060.html
- http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1P2-645842.html
- http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-110286859.html
- http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-110246522.html
- http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1P1-20762700.html
- http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1P1-103187837.html
- http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1P3-480973981.html
- http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1P2-4962435.html
- http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-54086259.html
- http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1A1-D8SS8H6O2.html
During the last years, in which Nkunda’s massacring mercenaries have haunted South and North Kivu in turns, Nkunda’s standard propaganda phrase has been that he regards himself as the guardian of the Rwandan Tutsis in Kivu.
Moreover, he sees himself as the executive body of the lynch law against the Hutu militias’ raids (today organised as FDLR-Front Démocratique pour la Libération du Rwanda) on the Tutsi minorities in Eastern Congo. Locally active human right groups have pointed out repeatedly that it is very unlikely that these former militant Hutu militias successors of the Interahamwe fanatics still exist at all, today.
Since 1996, the alleged Hutu threat against the Tutsi in Eastern Congo has been a pretext for the Rwandese to occupy Eastern Congolese territories. They can use a tactics, which corresponds to the one used in the Nine Men’s Morris game, guaranteeing that they dominate each situation. If the Congolese central government does, what it is to do according to Rwandan desire, i.e. look away from what is going on in Eastern Congo, the Rwandan raids on Eastern Congo do not arouse any trouble.
The UNHCR, RED CROSS and other humanitarian organizations had increased their supplies in the recent days before the RPF invasion so that when RPF attacks the refugee camps they could get easy food supply and medical supply that were stored in the UNHCR stocks. But uptodate there is no body who has stood up and ask the UNHCR why it increased the Humanitarian aid in the month of Ocyober 1996 while they knew very well that refugee camps are getting distroyed.
If Kinshasa or the international community look over their shoulders, the Rwandese set Nkunda’s murder gangs free and terrorise the population until Kinshasa retreats – whose army leadership also holds the reins on the Rwandese friends. (Is this the reason why the Congolese national army is so weak and incompetent?) Thus, a whole population is hostage in the hands of a modern system of systematic terror.
Hypocritical America, hypocritical Europe

The official resolutions and appeals, in particular those of the United States, the UN and the European Union, that the contractors should do without weapons and seek solutions at the negotiating table, are not honest. It is, in fact, the West that directly gains profit from the Rwandese-Congolese mafia or respectively developed it for economic and geostrategic goals and now keeps it going-on the backs of hundreds of thousands of innocent people, who once more bleed out and die.
Who wants that? Who profits from that? In the meantime, a completely different definition of the term “genocide” circulates in Congolese exile circles. The people in Eastern Congo do not only feel that the world public abandoned them. For some time already, they feel as if they were victims of some systematic politics of destruction, which obviously aim at depopulating Eastern Congo of its domestic population, the Congolese. The horrors cannot be explained otherwise. It is easy to imagine who will then repopulate the areas rich in raw materials.
Until it will have come to that, the “normal” life in Europe will probably take its course. After all, everything is so far away, and it is happening merely in Africa. Just as if forced resettlements, the intimidation of the population, summary executions, torture and rape and also the extermination had not been decided upon, not long ago, in a detention centre near Munich, and then some years later, in the government building, in the Berlin Reichstag. The book, in which everything has already been described, is called “Mein Kampf”.