Habyarimana Kagame15 Feb 2008, 23:24

Does Rwandan “development record” prevent criminals from being prosecuted. What is the link between administering justice and being jealous for Rwanda’s development. Is there development in this Central African nation that relies entirely on foreign aid, with no steady supply of power, no proper functioning infrastructure, and a big proportion of poor and starving peasants. What is wrong with suspected criminals facing justice? How can we determine the innocence of anyone, unless by examining them by laws? Why should Hutus be prosecuted for their participation in genocide and not Tustis when evidence shows that the latter took part in reprisal killings in Rwanda and beyond its borders? As Rwandans we see not even the slightest objection to an all-round justice. Judge Frenado needs to be commended for his firm belief in equity justice as a way of enhancing democracy. If Kagame and his cronies are rules innocent, then they will be set free and can resume their normal lives. Refraining to administer judicial trials against suspected genocidares in the RPF regime is a crime similarly to the laxity of the rest of the world in intervening in the 1994 catastrophe.But the people of Rwanda too have a role to play in exercising justice. Madame Victoire iNGABIRE of the Rwandan Rally for Democracy quoted in her independence speech that foreign powers might never take the initiative to arrest RPF genocide suspect, in that case, the Rwandan people have to do so.The only way to do so is to fight this ugly blood-thirst regime. Rwandans cannot be ruled by killers and therefore, an armed struggle has approval. The revolutionary war will have the responsibility of bringing Kagame and his cronies under justice. And ending the cycle of impunity in central Africa once for all.
Habyarimana Kagame15 Feb 2008, 23:24

Does Rwandan “development record” prevent criminals from being prosecuted. What is the link between administering justice and being jealous for Rwanda’s development. Is there development in this Central African nation that relies entirely on foreign aid, with no steady supply of power, no proper functioning infrastructure, and a big proportion of poor and starving peasants. What is wrong with suspected criminals facing justice? How can we determine the innocence of anyone, unless by examining them by laws? Why should Hutus be prosecuted for their participation in genocide and not Tustis when evidence shows that the latter took part in reprisal killings in Rwanda and beyond its borders? As Rwandans we see not even the slightest objection to an all-round justice. Judge Frenado needs to be commended for his firm belief in equity justice as a way of enhancing democracy. If Kagame and his cronies are rules innocent, then they will be set free and can resume their normal lives. Refraining to administer judicial trials against suspected genocidares in the RPF regime is a crime similarly to the laxity of the rest of the world in intervening in the 1994 catastrophe.But the people of Rwanda too have a role to play in exercising justice. Madame Victoire iNGABIRE of the Rwandan Rally for Democracy quoted in her independence speech that foreign powers might never take the initiative to arrest RPF genocide suspect, in that case, the Rwandan people have to do so.The only way to do so is to fight this ugly blood-thirsty regime. Rwandans cannot be ruled by killers and therefore, an armed struggle has approval. The revolutionary war will have the responsibility of bringing Kagame and his cronies under justice. And ending the cycle of impunity in central Africa once for all.

The Truth can be buried and stomped into the ground where none can see, yet eventually it will, like a seed, break through the surface once again far more potent than ever, and Nothing can stop it. Truth can be suppressed for a time, yet It cannot be destroyed => Wolverine