Stop treating the Bruguière inquiryWhen are we going to stop treating the Bruguière inquiry as a case of universal jurisdiction? It is not. The French courts’ competence here is based on the fact that some of the victims were French nationals. Many countries in the world, including Rwanda, make their national courts competent under such circumstances. So this has nothing to do with universal jurisdiction. Do the Rwandans genuinely ignore this fact or do they insist on this being a case of universal jurisdiction because this makes it easier for them to make a case against the French inquiry?
Filip Reyntjens, in «La Guerre des Grands Lacs, Alliances mondiales et conflits extraterritoriaux en Afrique Centrale ».
The Truth can be buried and stomped into the ground where none can see, yet eventually it will, like a seed, break through the surface once again far more potent than ever, and nothing can stop it. Truth can be suppressed for a “time”, yet it cannot be destroyed. ==> Wolverine
The Truth can be buried and stomped into the ground where none can see, yet eventually it will, like a seed, break through the surface once again far more potent than ever, and Nothing can stop it. Truth can be suppressed for a time, yet It cannot be destroyed => Wolverine
